Author: Owen Roche

  • Fordham’s War on Color

    Ask anyone at Fordham: they’ll tell you they don’t see color.

    I do.

    There’s a problem at Fordham College at Lincoln Center. It’s stained into our very walls and confronts us no matter where we turn. It has painted our school as a place of confusion, turmoil and discord—and it’s a veritable rejection of our history. It’s time someone said something.

    Fordham has a color problem. Maroon, to be exact.

    A quick trip to Fordham’s website (or asking the nearest Jesuit) will quickly reveal that Fordham’s school color is indisputably, undeniably maroon. Not orange, not purple, not burgundy, not cordovan, not even claret. However, a quick trip through the Lincoln Center campus suggests otherwise, and the problem is only getting worse. Discordant color combos abound. We’re losing our identity shade by shade. It’s a difficult truth, but it must be said: we look like Bootleg Fordham.

    Take the front façade of the Leon Lowenstein Center, for example—and how it’s bafflingly, bewilderingly blue. Prospective students gathered for tours must be constantly confused: is this Fordham, or some azure knock-off? Of course, the color dysphoria compounds as any comprehensive Fordham visit continues through our more updated underground passageways sporting the latest in inoffensive, wall-to-wall gray hues. The deafening assault on the senses is truly exhilarating; a visual representation of Fresh Air with Terry Gross played at full volume.

    Or perhaps consider Lincoln Center’s infamous stretch of barren hallway affectionately nicknamed the “Green Mile”: walls behind the Law School lobby painted a head-scratching pistachio. I misspeak—only one wall of the corridor bears the offending pigment. The other side, blindingly white, reflects the green in a way that gives the casual passerby an impression that he or she has entered a minty liminal space between two dimensions.

    I cannot paint this more heavy-handedly—the situation is bleak. The colors are careless. The last remaining stalwarts of maroon languish in the floors of Lowenstein, and cracking open a Sherwin Williams and vigilante-painting in the dead of night doesn’t seem so bad anymore. 

    But mere weeks ago, a spark of hope emerged: a chance to turn the tide in the Fordham Color War. The renovated sixth floor reopened, undoubtedly redecorated and repainted that quintessential Fordham maroon. Right?

    The sixth floor, styled in the sterile, office-building chic we’ve come to know and tolerate, was in fact smattered in green. Disgustingly verdant accent walls and upholstery stretch as far as the eye can see in this sparkling slap in the face to everything Fordham purports to stand for. Great risk accompanies falling asleep in the new classrooms; one may awake under the impression they’ve been teleported into a hospital waiting room. The powers that be have gifted us glittering classrooms, natural lighting and all the fancy Dyson hand dryers we could ever want. But they’re not fooling me. I stand against the Green Agenda.

    We’ve forgotten our school colors. It’s time we remembered them. Any semblance of cohesive identity (while bolstered by our single Ram statue) is gone the minute the last wall is graced in green. There are no intramural sports at this campus. We have no pool table. The school pastime is staying indoors. If all we have to cling to is paint swatches, so be it.

    The raucous cacophony of color must end. Fordham has what it takes to reconcile with maroon and make a full recovery. But if fears that maroon is too far gone—that an official color change is in order—we are equally lost. Do we retain the azure signage of the main entrance or the verdant walls and accents of our newer additions? The grimy beige of Lowenstein classroom walls or the vaguely white hues of cinder block tunnels?

    Only time will tell. We await the fate of the Fordham color palette with a fervor of college students with nothing better to do. Until then, I beg of you: resist the Green Menace. Reject the deep blue scene. Pray the gray away. End the Fordham Color War.

    We are neither an office building—nor a waiting room—nor a minty interdimensional hallway. We’re a university—a maroon one, no less. Let’s act like it.

  • Irrational Disasters: Unwise Simply to Weather the Storm

    You can admit it. You’ve seen the headlines. Wildfires. Hurricanes. Droughts. You’ve glanced and skimmed and swiped and scrolled and, at long last, you did one thing we humans are really, really good at: you sent your Thoughts and Prayers™ and forgot about it. With the sheer volume of natural disasters in 2017, I can’t blame you.

    But allow me to speak in a language we all can understand: at the end of 2017, after flood waters receded and fires finally fizzled, we tallied a bill worth paying attention to.

    Last year, Mother Nature dealt the United States of America its costliest recompense to date: a string of hurricanes, wildfires and other natural disasters totaling $306 billion in damage. The runner-up: 2005’s $215 billion price tag, thanks in no small part to a certain Hurricane Katrina. Moreover, the top three disasters of 2017—a murderer’s row of hurricanes Harvey, Maria and Irma—alone smashed 2005’s record, dealing $265 billion of destruction.

    It’s times like these in which one starts to suspect our nation just might be built on a Native American burial ground.

    It’s safe to say that last year, America was hit hard. Three storms category four or higher made landfall last year, the California wildfires were the costliest on record and our country experienced billion-dollar disasters in six of the seven categories the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tracks: tropical cyclone, wildfire, severe storm, flood, freeze and drought. A costly winter storm in 2017 could have completed the set (and my natural disaster bingo card).

    I’ll direct those who saw 2017 as a fluke to the very first days of January 2018, when we were introduced to the terrifyingly-named “bomb cyclone.” Weaponized winter came with a hefty price tag as well, and might just indicate that—unlike liquids, waning crescents, and emo teens—it’s not just a phase.

    Do you yearn for the old days? Do you pine for simpler times when “polar vortex” was the scariest-sounding buzzword on the Weather Channel? Do you look fondly on the years gone by filled with only one or two devastating hurricanes per year?

    There’s good news: the good ol’ days when every natural disaster didn’t cause Bill Gates’s net worth in damage aren’t gone forever. That being said, even to begin to sidestep this snowballing yearly insurance claim, we first and foremost have to take accountability.

    In the current world climate—political and otherwise—it is easier to pretend that everything is more or less going to even out. Hurricanes Harvey, Maria and Irma delivered their refutation loud and clear: this is not normal.

    Is it a result of global warming? Climate change? Aliens? Who cares? Debate over terminology and politics bring us back to square one: partisan squabbling that goes in one ear and out the other of a nation that skims and swipes and scrolls and forgets. It’s time to break the cycle.

    Some push for greenhouse gas emission reduction, others push for fortifying vulnerable regions against future disaster. These opinions are often pitted against each other on party lines when, in reality, they are both helping. They are both valuable solutions. It doesn’t matter what party you cheer on like some football team—hurricanes don’t just flood Republican homes, nor do wildfires exclusively torch Democrats’.

    It doesn’t take a liberal or a conservative or an anarcho-capitalist to tell that this is not normal. And our insurance bill will keep getting bigger every year we will twiddle our thumbs like our lives depended on it. As natural disasters are made into talking points and ammunition against another group of people who live on the same Earth as everyone else, the implications of 2017’s $306 billion slap in the face get lost in the details.

    And what’s left? Thoughts and Prayers™. And the world keeps spinning.

    And warming, I might add.

  • Thanksgiving 2017: A Debate Primer

    For some, the word “Thanksgiving” conjures rosy memories of food, friends and family. But we all know the unavoidable, uncomfortable main course to any true family Thanksgiving: no-holds-barred political debate. 

    You may have forgotten why you left for college. As you gear up for your holiday trip back home, prepare to remember. After months of polite discourse and general open-mindedness, it’s time to unlearn everything. You are about to approach a forum unmatched in hostility, a jury of your peers that get their news from social media and hate the term “liberal arts” because it has the word “liberal” in it. 2017 is a year steeped in controversy. A battle of wits and raised voices with your closest relatives is a dangerous game.

    It would behoove you to come prepared.

    What follows is an unofficial news briefing on the topics most likely to fill the air around the Thanksgiving table. I will offer my best advice on how to address each issue. If you don’t get damned to hell by your elder relatives before dessert, I’d consider it a good year.

    The discussion might start innocently enough, perhaps referencing a relative’s recent Facebook post of Ewan McGregor, clothed in brown robes as Obi Wan Kenobi, with a caption prompting viewers to like and comment “amen” if he’s their savior. Did you comment “amen?” Did you? Don’t tell me you kept scrolling. 

    The conversation may swing to the pros and cons of vaccination. Beware Auntie Anecdote, a reliable font of plausible stories that just happen to fall right in line with her arguments. Sure, a flu shot just might have turned the baby of a woman in her spin class into a homosexual, but don’t bother pressing for proof. Be careful not to let your guard down—Polio was, indeed, that bad. 

    Pros and cons of veganism will be touted, and warnings of your untimely demise from a red meat and cheddar cheese deficiency will be abundant. I know you’ll be itching to pull out your well-worn “Earthlings” DVD and play it. Eat your tofurkey and keep your head down.

    To those who suggest their great-grandparents didn’t travel all the way to America to see it overrun by immigrantsa brief history of intercontinental ocean travel may be necessary. Start in 1492, just to cover all the bases.

    No Thanksgiving is complete without a football game, and your challenge is twofold: parry indictments of disrespect and outright treason on the football players engaged in peaceful protest, and counter someone’s inevitable claim that the sport just isn’t tough anymore with all the increased safety rules. For the first, express curiosity as to the whereabouts of this place where people can actually demonstrate their discontent and everyone is happy about it. For the second … well, they say many types of brain damage are irreversible. Might not be worth your time.

    Gay marriage may come up, even though it’s old news by now. Do what I always do and pose this question: Isn’t it kind of gay to think about all those gay people marrying all the time? 

    But as surely as big, inflatable Charlie Brown will loom ominously over the New York skyline on Nov. 23, the elephant in the room will have to be addressed at some point. Thanksgiving 2017’s most controversial topic of discussion is unavoidable, deeply personal and unequivocally orange. I’m sorry—I don’t know how to prepare you for this one. 

    It deeply saddens me that half of the United States of America could be so callous as to continue to support marshmallows on sweet potatoes. It’s a tragedy, but sweet potato partisanship in our country is worse now than ever. George Washington was right; it never should’ve come to this.

    By now, the tryptophan will start to kick in, and you’ll finally get a break from the debates you never asked for. Talking to people we’ll only see a couple more times a year and defending our every last conviction to the death is the perennial struggle; beyond the classroom, the Thanksgiving table is the true proving ground. After leaving the politeness and thoughtfulness you’ve been taught in the dust, you don’t feel dirty. You feel alive. 

    Flinging mashed potatoes, threatening divorce and narrowly dodging disownment is what debating current events is all about. Execute your rhetoric mercilessly. Make your opponent’s submission quick and painful. 

    And have a happy Thanksgiving.

  • A Brunch with Death: Student Caught in Meal Limbo

    UNDERGRADUATE DINING HALL—In the aftermath of what has been described by witnesses as “the greatest dining blunder in the past 10 years,” a local student has been taken into school custody, reportedly after attempting to acquire food in the undergraduate dining hall at 10:47 a.m. EST. 

    The news has blindsided Fordham Lincoln Center (FLC), as it is common knowledge that from Monday to Thursday, the dining hall serves breakfast from 7 a.m. to 10:30 a.m., lunch from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. and dinner from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. 

    The No Meal Period (NMP) from 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. has been a fixture of school dining policy since Fordham’s inception. The nature of the 30 minute blackout in meal coverage is largely unknown. Popular speculation points to a spacetime anomaly necessitating daily stabilization, explaining the interdimensional time beings on Fordham’s dining services payroll.

    Upon detection and subsequent apprehension, the 18-year-old Caucasian male perpetrator in question was led out of the hall in handcuffs, stomach growling in defiance.

    “You don’t mess with the schedule. Rules are rules, and if people start eating whenever they want, we’ll have anarchy,” explained a dining hall representative on the condition of anonymity. “Who could possibly be hungry at 10:45 a.m.?”

    The idiocy—or boldness—of the student’s actions has rocked the university to its very core. Support for the mealtime terrorist has manifested in elevator grumblings and unabashed dorm rants—which, thanks to McKeon Hall’s strategically thin walls, have allowed for quick detection and suppression by RAs. Conversely, support for the continued enforcement of the NMP has been resounding.

    “It’s my job as an American to uphold every last societal convention I’ve been raised on to the letter,” said one concerned onlooker, peering through the street-level windows of the dining hall. “Liberal universities have kids questioning too much, and they act surprised when students choose to eat a sandwich after 10:30 and before 11. 10:45? Typical leftist ignorance.” 

    He ran away, shouting “Ignatius was a witch” over his shoulder, before he could be reached for further comment. 

    It is, understandably, ludicrous to imagine the precedent that could have been set had the student been served during the NMP. Similar alarming incidents of rogue eating, most notably foolhardy attempts to eat dinner after 7 p.m. on Saturdays, point to a similar conclusion: opportunities to fill students’ hedonistic stomachs outside of regular operating hours spell doom for the university. 

    This has not deterred school officials, as rumors of closing the NMP swirl through the university. A potential restructuring of operation hours smacks of 1930’s appeasement policy—all those familiar with “The Very Hungry Caterpillar” know the ramifications if an example is not made of this morning’s attempted 10:45 a.m. sandwich. 

    The 30 minutes between breakfast and lunch belong to no one. Fordham must not bend to the demands of its ravenous students: the NMP is a time for reflection and meditation just as the hours after 8 p.m., 7 p.m. on Saturdays, and 6 p.m. on Sundays are undoubtedly meant for intellectual stimulation and full-bellied studying. 

    The university surely holds its breath as a verdict is deliberated. In the meantime, students can rest easy knowing their full academic plates can be paired nicely with even fuller dining hall platters during normal operating hours. Fordham has put its trust in reason, tradition and cooler heads winning the day—one can only hope that rogue eating may prove to be just a passing fad.

  • Newest Ram Statue Sparks Never-Before-Seen School Spirit

    Top university officials dropped a 500-pound bombshell on the student body just weeks ago—what has been described as a “giant metal ram” by onlookers has been installed on Fordham’s singular stronghold of grass.

    Standing four feet tall and composed of a gray metal composite with gold accents, the ram is Fordham Lincoln Center’s newest addition. Robert Moses Plaza, allegedly a gathering place for the school community, now falls under the watchful eye of the quarter-ton metal beast.

    “I didn’t know what our mascot was, and I didn’t want to know,” said Alan H, a freshman known for blowing off floor meetings and taking the elevator to his 2nd floor class. “This is another bold-faced attempt by the university to foist spirit on our school.”

    Murmurings among the shocked crowd gathered around the metal colossus suggest students are outraged, distressed and under the impression that school pride was just kind of a thing that Rose Hill did.

    Cult implications have run rampant through Fordham’s beige, undecorated walls. Students fear that erecting effigies is only the first step toward the slippery slope of school spirit.

    “What’s next, pep rallies? If I wanted to get my buddies together and spell out “Fordham” on our chests, I would’ve gone to Penn State,” said Colby W., a junior who enjoys living weeks on end without setting foot outside. He quickly fled through the Gabelli doors before further questions could be asked.

    Within minutes of the statue’s arrival, hundreds of charters for pep bands, intramural sports teams and improv comedy groups inundated student council email servers. Levels of mindless prejudice and unfounded feelings of personal supremacy—side effects associated with “team spirit” and “rivalry,” per a 2010 study—have undoubtedly reached all-time highs in the university. Mascot-emblazoned spirit wear was completely sold out three days following the incident, with more on the way. The result: hundreds of students rallying behind the siren song of the metal ram.

    Ranging from casual acceptance to violent rejection, the reaction among the population has been mixed. Another freshman, Kelsey L., weighed in: “Sure, now we have a puppet to draw a false sense of collective from. But was there tofu in the dining hall yesterday?” She continued, urging our correspondent to watch What the Health and see the truth.

    Long-term effects on the student body are still under close watch; already young people have been spotted attempting to tailgate before important mock trial events. Experts posit that if the ram’s presence remains unchecked, full-sized flag football games may appear on the plaza as early as 2020—with disastrous effects on local social ecosystems and sedentary lifestyles alike.

    It is yet to be seen whether foreign notions of “school spirit” and “school pride” brought about by the newly-ubiquitous ram will stick to the hearts, minds and nondescript buildings of Fordham University Lincoln Center. Nevertheless, the ram remains: keeping watch over the subjects of its new domain and patiently waiting for a game of KanJam to start in its midst.

    Go Rams.

  • Literacy Vignettes

    1

    My first experience with literature (more of a false start, really) came beside a pile of old second-hand books on the shelves of a TV armoire in Raymour & Flanigan.

    To a two-year-old, the furniture store is probably up there with flu shots and NPR on the NO scale. But all the NO’s in the world wouldn’t stop my parents from their search for the perfect end table, so there we were.

    At the top of the modest stack of outdated self-help books and Windows 96 For Dummies lay a single paperback volume, creased to all hell on the edges and spine, bearing the likenesses of a certain Jerry Seinfeld, George Costanza, Elaine Benes, and Cosmo Kramer.

    I had partaken in the almost ritualistic watching of Seinfeld reruns with my dad for as long as I could remember. After all those nights in front of the TV enjoying the show simply because my dad was and laughing whenever he did, I recognized the gang immediately. 

    “Seinfeld,” I said to my mom, brandishing the book above my head to show her.

    It was the people from Seinfeld, their faces were right there. The letters at the top of the book never really registered as anything. Didn’t all books have them? They were probably there for decoration.

    The bewildered look on the sales lady’s face suggested otherwise. It seemed the entire home office department was under the impression that this little kid had just read the English language with remarkable cadence and ease. My mom, privy to my actual (nonexistent) reading capabilities, took my hand and led me away to some other section of the store. I didn’t know why she was stifling her laughter behind a furniture brochure, and frankly, two-year-old Owen didn’t care. I had just seen Seinfeld on the front of a book—if that doesn’t make a kid’s day, I don’t know what will.

    Books have been making my day ever since.

    2

    For some people, a good book is like a bowl of oatmeal. Some enjoy it, some choke it down because it’s good for them, but it sticks with them for a while regardless, even long after they’re done.

    To me, a good book is a lot like junk food. I’ll finish the book, closing the back cover with great satisfaction, taste still in my mouth. I’ll tell other people how good it was, maybe rave about it on the internet, maybe leave a five-star review somewhere. And in fifteen minutes, I’ll be hungry again. And the soy sauce packets just keep piling up.

    When I was young, I was always dissatisfied with literature.

    In first grade, I had no patience for Cam Jansen, with her open-and-shut mysteries and gimmicky “photographic memory.” Junie B. Jones was just so whiny all the time. I gave the Magic Tree House a chance, but it was just the same thing over and over again. 

    “The tree house started to spin. It spun faster and faster. Then everything was still. Absolutely still.”

    Every. Single. Book. And Mary Pope Osbourne could churn out a new 100-page installment faster than you could say “James Patterson.” One needn’t have worried if Jack and Annie made it out of their most recent predicament alive; there were always forty more books in the series.

    Of course, I read them all anyway. They were there. At the dinner table, during class, in the bathroom, reading. Before school, after school, past my bedtime, reading. At one point, I yelled indignantly down the steps that my parents had to be the only parents on the block who got mad at their kid for reading. 

    Admittedly, I should have been doing the dishes, but hey—The Chronicles of Narnia don’t exactly read themselves.

    But one day, the flow of books dried up. There just weren’t any more books for a kid to read, at least not in the places in the library I was accustomed to looking. Nonfiction was off the table. I needed stories, and with nowhere else to turn, I had but one place to satisfy my hunger for literature: the YA section. 

    Excuse me while I cringe a little.

    Young adult literature admittedly has its flaws. Sarah Dessen, I’m looking at you. But the real reason I had a hard time with this whole new world of literature was that I was entirely in over my head. I had no concept of teen angst; I felt no connection to love triangles and could never understand why the main character chose to kiss their obvious love interest when there was a world to save or a giant zeppelin to pilot. They fed my voracious appetite for words, so I couldn’t complain. 

    In retrospect, I realize this was the point where I started to chew books just a little bit slower, savoring pages more than ever. At this point, whether I understood what I was reading or not, I started to realize how good literature could actually be. And maybe I could do that, too.

    3

    How to Bullshit Poetry
    Owen Roche

    She looked away

    The leaves fluttered

    In

    The

    Dappled

    Sunlight

    The cigarette was a bullet between his lips

    And it sang.

    The coffee was cold.

    He only knew the name they told him was his

    was his

    Was mine.

    Your eyes were Dalmatians.

    Where is the rain?

    Where is your rain?

    The sweet roar of bellowing roses

    That You p r o m i s e d

    For

    All

    These

    Years?

    4

    It took me a while to realize that while I could take in all this literature from all of these different authors, I could make some of my own. But I’m glad; if it weren’t for all the out-of-my-league books I struggled through, I wouldn’t have the infatuation with commas, unhealthy obsession with the em dash, or fascination with the rhythm of prose I possess today. Before I knew what any of those things were or how to quantify them, I simply took them in in their rawest form, subconsciously stockpiling an arsenal of punctuation and sentence structure.

    My first literary work I remember was a piece called How to Escape in the Middle of the Night that I wrote in second grade. I didn’t have any experience in the subject matter, but I didn’t let the details stop me.

    Whatever I was doing, I knew I enjoyed it. I could tell stories and weave the intangible out of pencil, paper, ink, and crayon. The language that had been a part of me from the beginning went from being an exhibit behind a red rope to my own personal tool that could stay in my back pocket for the rest of my life. 

    My problem with writing is that I want whatever I put on paper to sound like a final copy the first time. I think I’ve surrounded myself with so much of others’ good writing that my own writing voice wants to sound as polished as the great ones on the first pass. There’s some part of my brain that refuses to believe my favorite authors have backspace keys on their laptops, or trash cans filled to the brim with crumpled-up paper. 

    I know that I’m at my best when I can just vomit words all over the computer screen, then go back to the beginning and start to mop up the mess like some sort of literary janitor. It’s a lesson in humility, I know—hubris doesn’t lend itself well to writing or reading. 

    Good talk.

    5

    Block
    Owen Roche

    From the conveyor belt riveted to the walls of my mind

    Come chunks

    With serifs poking out

    At disjointed angles,

    Lumpy and raw.

    Grotesque, really.

    There’s time, I know

    While the globs of brain-stuff are still wet

    To mold

    And coat my hands in excess like

    A potter at the wheel

    And leave the ghosts of long-lost thought

    Like dirty, dingy coffee rings

    But why would I 

    Disgrace

    A page so white and fresh

    As this?

    6

    Maybe I’d write something. Poetry isn’t really a guy thing; y’know? Sure, there are all those famous male poets, but no other guy in the class raised his hand when they needed people to read for Poetry Day.

    Reading in front of all of those people? Is high school really the appropriate venue to showcase my sensitive side? Would it be weird?

    Well, I’ve written some good stuff in the past. I mean, thought it was pretty good. I think I have some talent, maybe not enough to read out loud—

    I saw her twist around in her chair, hair falling to the side of the desk.

    Her eyes sparkled as she mouthed a message:

    I can’t wait to see what you write.

    I’m definitely writing something.

    Hell, maybe I’ll make it rhyme.

  • St. Lawrence of Rome

    St. Lawrence of Rome (225-258 AD) is the patron saint of archivists, brewers, chefs, comedians, laundry workers, students, tanners, and wine makers, to name a few alphabetically. You’d be surprised to learn a saint with such a diverse patronage portfolio may have only been the stuff of legends.

    Then again, that just makes me like him more.

    Though Lawrence lived long before TMZ and Lifetime documentaries, some hazy details survive today. He is said to have been a promising young archdeacon of Rome, assigned to this position by longtime friend Pope Sixtus II. Lawrence was in charge of the Church’s riches in that little corner of the world, and he often found himself documenting the history of Christianity to make it accessible for the masses.

    In August 258, Roman Emperor Valerian issued an edict that all bishops, priests, and deacons should immediately be put to death. When confronted to hand over not only his life but the riches of the Church, Lawrence asked for three days’ time to assemble everything—during which he proceeded to distribute as much wealth as he could to the poor. 

    When Valerian came to collect his dues, the archbishop of Rome instead presented the emperor with the suffering, crippled, and blind, proclaiming that these people were the true treasures of the church.

    Long story short, he was grilled to death on a large gridiron—not before uttering his famous last words: “Turn me over, I’m well done on this side!”

    The story of Saint Lawrence may not be true. And I’m okay with that, because I believe the real impact he has made on me is exactly that: the power of story. 

    When Hamlet dies in the play bearing his name, his final wish is to have his story told. I don’t think St. Lawrence ever desired that, but fiery death aside, he lived a good life—promoting literacy, venerating the marginalized, and keeping the peace within his domain. That itself seems like the stuff of legends. 

    To give posterity a hero to keep forever—to create such a story that the essence of the good you do lives on forever—that’s pretty legendary, too. To live a life worth telling and retelling for generations is a lofty goal, but an admirable one as well.

    Aside from his slow-roasted demise, St. Lawrence isn’t too bad of a guy to model your life around. I have no dreams of holding high office in the Catholic church, but I do aspire to be someone with their priorities in order. Someone who values all the right things. 

    Someone who knows what their real treasures are. 

    And, when the end finally comes, I hope I’ll have a funny quip to be remembered by.